Repair Shop Cleared of Negligence for Not Repairing Parking Brake

Repair Shop Cleared of Negligence for Not Repairing Parking Brake

The Alaska Supreme Court recently upheld a lower court's ruling that said an automotive repair shop was not negligent when it did not fix a truck's parking brake. The shop had informed the vehicle's owner that they were unable to repair the parking brake and that the parking brake did not work. Not long after, the truck rolled backwards and injured the plaintiff.

The Alaska Supreme Court recently upheld a lower court’s ruling that said an automotive repair shop was not negligent when it did not fix a truck’s parking brake. The shop had informed the vehicle’s owner that they were unable to repair the parking brake and that the parking brake did not work. Not long after, the truck rolled backwards and injured the plaintiff.

Below is the article as it appeared on the Legal Newsline website.

Repair shop not at fault for broken parking brake

By Jessica M. Karmasek
October 06, 2010

JUNEAU, Alaska (Legal Newsline) – The Alaska Supreme Court has affirmed the ruling of a lower court in favor of an automotive repair shop that failed to fix a truck’s parking brake before it rolled over someone.

The Court, in an opinion filed Friday, upheld the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of E&E Automotive & Tire Service, Inc., and its owner, James Egbert.

In March 2005, Timothy Lindsey was severely injured when his employer’s unattended truck rolled backwards and struck him. An inspection revealed that the cause of the accident was a non-functioning parking brake.

Lindsey sued E&E Automotive & Tire Service Inc., the repair shop that had recently serviced the truck, for negligence.

E&E had been asked to repair the parking brake but was unable to do so. E&E informed Lindsey’s employer that it had not repaired the parking brake and that the brake still did not work.

The superior court granted summary judgment in E&E’s favor, concluding that E&E had fulfilled its duty to warn Lindsey’s employer that the requested repair had not been made and that a defect still existed with the parking brake. Lindsey subsequently appealed.

To read the entire article, visit the Legal Newsline website at http://www.legalnewsline.com/news/228987-repair-shop-not-at-fault-for-broken-parking-brake.

You May Also Like

GSP Releases New CV Axle Part Numbers

GSP said 14 new CV axle part numbers are in stock and ready to ship.

GSP released 14 new CV axle part numbers. These parts are compatible with select Chevy, Chrysler, Subaru, BMW, Land Rover, Dodge and Hyundai vehicles.

The parts are in stock and ready to ship. Visit gspnorthamerica.com for more information.

BCA Bearings Unveils 2024 Endless Summer Promotion

The Endless Summer promotion runs from May 1 through June 30, 2024.

PRT Launches 30 New Complete Strut Assemblies

The new items represent more than 10 million vehicles in new coverage, PRT said.

RNR Tire Express Hosts Mother’s Day Giveaway

The eighth-annual event promises $100,000 in prizes, as well as a brand new 2024 Buick Encore for one select nominee.

Brand Refresh for Tires Plus, Hibdon Tires Plus Begins

Logo updates include a single-color tire mark; a logo palette comprised of Tires Plus yellow, black and red; and refined typefaces.

Other Posts

Wheel Bearing Service

When faced with any noise complaint, take the time to test-drive the car with the customer, if that’s possible.

Axle Torque Procedures

Guessing the correct torque setting is a bad idea.

Gen 1 Wheel Bearings

Removing and installing these bearings requires the correct tools and patience.

Continental Tire Opens Retread Solutions Center in South Carolina

The company said it hopes to uncover new improvements and technologies to innovate the retread process.