Viewpoint: Criminal Inspection

Viewpoint: Criminal Inspection

I often work on co-worker’s cars in the BRAKE & FRONT END company garage. Some of the pictures that you see in this magazine are taken while I am working on their cars. Usually, beer and a home-cooked meal are all that I ask for in return for my work. But, a recent case in New York has me rethinking performing work on co-worker’s cars, or even giving them advice.

Here is the case in a nutshell. A 1989 Ford Tempo was bought for $175. The vehicle was then taken to a shop and the brakes were inspected as part of a state inspection program. After the inspection, the young driver had some work performed on the brakes by a friend or backyard mechanic. One day, the driver was descending a hill and was unable to stop for a school bus at the bottom. Tragically, he struck and killed a child as she was exiting the bus. This past December, the 17-year-old driver was charged with criminally negligent homicide.

But, the shocker came when criminal charges were filed against the shop manager who performed the inspection. The shop manager was charged with criminally negligent homicide, reckless endangerment in the 2nd degree, and falsifying business records in the 2nd degree.

I am not talking about a civil lawsuit that is looking for deep pockets. I am talking about criminal charges with the potential for prison time for the shop manager.

The state of New York has a mandatory annual state inspection and a required inspection when the title changes hands. The inspection requires that at least one wheel be removed from the vehicle for a brake check. It is a basic check that covers the mechanical and hydraulic systems.

The driver maintained that the vehicle’s brakes were not functioning at the time of the accident, and that he swerved to the right to avoid rear-ending the car behind the bus.

No information has been released revealing if the brakes suffered a hydraulic or mechanical failure. Also, it is not clear if the car suffered “brake fade.” But, it has been revealed that the driver had some work performed by another mechanic and that the driver added brake fluid on one or more occasions.

Responsibility
I hate jumping to conclusions. But, in my opinion it is not the fault of the person who inspected the vehicle.

The driver has to take responsibility for his actions. The driver should have known the performance capabilities of the brakes before he crested that hill. Also, the parents of the driver should have known their son’s driving capabilities before they put him behind the wheel of a $175 clunker.

But, the district attorney in this case sees it differently. In the local paper, he gave his version of where the responsibility lies.

“The shop owner was responsible for ensuring that vehicle was safe to operate on the highway,” District Attorney Donald Cerio said. “The shop owner failed to perform a competent exam. That put into motion the ability of the subsequent owner to operate the vehicle.”

It is only human nature to want to place blame on someone after a tragedy. It is also human nature to avoid responsibility for negative actions. But, the district attorney is taking the blame game too far this time.

The local prosecutor initially wanted to put the driver and the shop manager on trial together, but they have been granted separate trials. At the time of writing this, the trial was scheduled to start in mid-February. I will tell you the results of the trial in the March issue of BRAKE & FRONT END.

But, this whole incident has me reconsidering performing work on fellow employees’ vehicles. It seems that the “Beer and a Home Cooked Meal” garage is closed for now.

You May Also Like

Child Labor for Repair Shops

This could be a chance to introduce teenagers to the auto care industry.

I saw something while walking into a retail parts store recently. It was a large sign stating they’re hiring at age 16. I think this is a brilliant move! It could help solve some labor shortages while creating future employees for the auto care industry.

I realize this could be a polarizing issue for those on both the left and right. Some see it as a pro-business move to alleviate post-pandemic labor shortages. Others see it as a way for big corporations to hire cheap labor. Myself? I am taking the long-term view on the opportunity because it is a chance to introduce teenagers to the auto care industry.

MEYLE Expands Electronics, Sensor Product Portfolio

The focus is on assistance systems and engine and transmission management, with more than 300 new part numbers.

FCS Introduces 42 New Numbers in May

Complete strut assemblies, shock absorbers, shock absorber assembly kits and suspension struts for popular VIO applications are included.

Philips Ultinon Drive 5000 LED Lightbar Line Expands

Lumileds has expanded the Philips Ultinon Drive 5000 series to include eight models.

DMA Adds New BrakeMaster Coverage

New coverage for Ford and Chevy includes popular pickup trucks and SUVs.

Other Posts
Non-Competes

The FTC’s rule is set to take effect in about four months, unless it is blocked by legal challenges.

Akebono Expands Severe Duty Disc Brake Pad Kits

Akebono said it expanded its severe-duty ultra-premium disc brake pad line by 14 new part numbers.

GSP Releases New CV Axle Part Numbers

GSP said 14 new CV axle part numbers are in stock and ready to ship.

BCA Bearings Unveils 2024 Endless Summer Promotion

The Endless Summer promotion runs from May 1 through June 30, 2024.