Pulling Codes: Advanced Misfire and Fuel Trim Analysis -- A P030X Detailed Analysis

Pulling Codes: Advanced Misfire and Fuel Trim Analysis — A P030X Detailed Analysis

Carlton Banks documents the use of fuel trims and oxygen sensor behavior to determine if the misfire activity is ignition, engine mechanical or fuel related.

This article will document the use of fuel trims and oxygen sensor behavior to determine if the misfire activity is ignition, engine mechanical or fuel related. We will address this in a two-part series from the viewpoint of moments in time to offer a deeper understanding of these concepts.

Our first article on this subject will address ignition-related misfires. We will explore other misfire research in the next article. The first step is to visualize these failures from the beginning figures 1 and 1a: pre- and post-oxygen sensors under normal activity.— picture that an ignition-related misfire has occurred on a subject vehicle. We come to define it as a single cylinder misfire, prior to failure the pre-oxygen is switching and working as designed. The post-oxygen sensor is also working as designed and almost appears as a straight line when looked at per graphical data or a Pico lab scope. ­Figures 1 and 1a denote how the pre- and post-oxygen sensors may look on a subject vehicle prior to any type of misfire-related activity.

Let’s use a 2007 Ford Taurus as an example. The IDS scan tool will be used to show the activity.figures 2 and 2a: pre- and post-oxygen sensors under ­ignition misfire activity.

Figures 2 and 2a denote the activity of the pre- and post-oxygen sensors at the initial point of ignition misfire activity. A close examination shows the pre-oxygen sensor went low, indicating that it saw oxygen in the exhaust stream at the very moment the misfire activity occurred. The post-oxygen sensor went high, indicating how the vehicle has a tendency to run (rich).

Note that at the very point of failure, the short-term fuel trim (STFT) will increase and, depending on design and strategy of the system, may show impressive numbers for short term, after the processor has acknowledged this, the resources of long-term fuel trim (LTFT) will work to get the short-term numbers back as close as possible to at or near zero. The end result is that after corrective action has taken place by the processor, there will not be a significant impact on the total fuel trim (ST + LT). This analysis is based on a subject vehicle that has good fuel trim values to start with. A range of +/-5% is optimal on many systems today, but a range of +/-10% may be acceptable.

A great example is a vehicle that has a total correction of 15% prior to fault; you’ll have higher numbers once ignition misfire activity occurs. I’ve found that on many vehicles with ignition misfire activity after the corrective action has taken place, single-digit numbers appear to be reasonable.

 

2004 Chevy Impala

Now let’s take a look at a 2004 Chevrolet Impala with a P0300 stored in memory.figure 3: the firing order shows that cylinders 5 and 2 are sister cylinders.

Upon review of this failure, note that the vehicle has a misfire code and freeze-frame information as well. The data shows that a STFT of -4% and a LTFT of 7% was noted; this is a total correction of 3%, which is not a significant impact on the total fuel trim correction. Figure 4: Is this misfire activity ignition or fuel related?

The misfire activity appears to be on cylinders 2 and 5, and, based on service information, it appears that these two cylinders are companion cylinders. See ­Figures 3 and 4. After careful review of this case study, it was clear that a bad coil assembly was at fault. The Tech 2 scan tool was used for this analysis. This observer would also ask that you take into ­account systems that will turn off the injectors when misfire activity occurs, the fuel trim values will go to zero once the fault is set.

This Pulling Codes case is now considered closed, however, we invite any questions concerning this fault analysis. 

 

You May Also Like

Schaeffler, ATSG Partner to Support Technical Education

Schaeffler will provide ATSG members with ongoing education and technical resources.

Motion technology provider Schaeffler announced it entered into a partnership with ATSG to become its primary sponsor. Through this agreement, Schaeffler will provide ongoing technical education support to the members of ATSG, which has offered technical support and repair information for transmission technicians for almost 40 years.

Through its LuK brand, Schaeffler’s partnership with ATSG will "bring significant educational benefits to technicians in the aftermarket transmission repair industry," the company said. Schaeffler added it will deliver technical educational content to ATSG members via in-person and online training events focused on trouble shooting and repair best practices.

Driveshaft, Axle and Drivetrain Noise FAQs

Follow along to learn more about these unwanted noises.

Driveshaft Diagnostics

The big challenge with late-model vehicles is the diversity of driveshafts. 

Nissan CVT Clutch Point Relearn Procedure

The Adaptive Shift Control delivers responsive and powerful acceleration.

Diagnostic Test Drive For Drivetrain

A driveshaft center bearing can fail due to the bearing and the rubber isolator.

Other Posts
MEYLE Expands Electronics, Sensor Product Portfolio

The focus is on assistance systems and engine and transmission management, with more than 300 new part numbers.

FCS Introduces 42 New Numbers in May

Complete strut assemblies, shock absorbers, shock absorber assembly kits and suspension struts for popular VIO applications are included.

Philips Ultinon Drive 5000 LED Lightbar Line Expands

Lumileds has expanded the Philips Ultinon Drive 5000 series to include eight models.

DMA Adds New BrakeMaster Coverage

New coverage for Ford and Chevy includes popular pickup trucks and SUVs.